Christina Hoff Sommers replies to the National Academy of Sciences' new study on the status of female science, engineering, and mathematics teachers and researchers in higher education.

Women do not have an assigned place. Women are various. One size does not fit all.

This volume is a is a lively, readable, and balanced collection of articles by distinguished scholars from both sides of an often-contentious debate over the complex relationship between gender and vocation.

Gender bias has been a hot button topic of discrimination for many years, but after analyzing 20 years of data, two Cornell professors have concluded that, in academic science, women are treated just as well as men.

AEI's Christina Hoff Sommers is concerned by attempts to transform academic science with feminist dogma, which would reduce American competitiveness.

Are women victims of a widespread bias in science and engineering, as a 2006 report of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) concluded? Or are there alternative explanations for the paucity of women in various quantitative fields? What, if anything, is to be done to encourage more women engineers and...

The forlorn and increasingly desperate climate campaign achieved a new level of ineptitude last week when what had looked like a minor embarrassment for one of its critics​—​the Chicago-based Heartland Institute​—​turned out to be a full-fledged catastrophe for itself. A moment’s reflection on the root of this episode points to why the climate campaign is out of (greenhouse) gas.

President Obama's decision to issue a blanket moratorium on deepwater oil drilling, inaccurately claiming the policy was recommended by scientists, underscores his fundamental misunderstanding of the role of science in policymaking.