Online registration for this event is closed. Walk-in registrations will be accepted.

Americans are increasingly concerned about the availability and affordability of energy. How will we generate energy in the coming decades—and what will it cost? Will we continue to rely upon politically unstable and sometimes hostile nations to provide...

Recent advances in Iran’s nuclear weapons program show that events are moving extraordinarily swiftly, as Tehran nears the end of its decades-long quest to possess a lethal WMD capability.

Despite the recent Deepwater Horizon disaster, offshore drilling is an opportunity that we cannot afford to squander, as our energy security and economic growth depend on it.

At this juncture, blunt questions need to be asked about whether sanctions can work on Iran and if we can live with a nuclear Iran.

What could sanctions against Iran really do?

If the United States and the United Nations are serious about nonproliferation, they must challenge Venezuela and Iran to come clean about their nuclear pursuits and, if necessary, take steps to hold both regimes accountable.

It has become a cliché to suggest that sanctions are not the silver bullet to shut down Iran's nuclear weapons programs. Part of the problem has been the "too little, too late" nature of almost every effort at sanctions.

The New York Times rattled energy markets this week with a Sunday front page story asserting that many "insiders" in the natural gas industry harbor serious doubts about the long-term viability of the natural gas market.