The authorresponds to Michael Kinsley's critique.

Employers worry more about the effects of a bad hire than about the problems of hiring someone who is competent but not exceptional.

When the government launched its suit against Microsoft in 1998, it was in effect making a prediction about the evolution of technology. Microsoft, the government said, should not be allowed to beat back rivals who believed the future of computing rests with the Internet. Now, with the Justice Department's new...

The Justice Department’s proposed remedy in the case of U.S. v. Microsoft is only tangentially related to the alleged offense.

The federal antitrust suit against Microsoft has potentially profound implications for information technology industries and for business conduct in both the marketplace and the political arena.

Recent history suggests that technological change, not antitrust intervention, is the best defender of competition.

Since modern conservatism professes devotion to free markets and to the rule of law, conservative hostility to Microsoft suggests an inadequate understanding of the case.

All the rules that govern the technology sector are being rewritten by the industry's participants every six months or so. Does Washington really need to add new, top-down rules into that mix?