The World Bank's malaria program does not appear to comply with the World Health Organization's technical guidelines.

Malaria country governments, donors, UN agencies, and advocates should focus on policy reforms needed to achieve sustained improvement in malaria treatment outcomes in Africa.

Most anti-malarial drugs are obtained in the private sector and few of the widely discussed drugs are actually bought by most Africans.

The Global Fund is to be commended for its transparency, but it has failed to act on the information it has gleaned, and continues to allow its funds to be used by governmental distribution systems known to be corrupt.

The UN's push for a "zero DDT world" ignores the millions of lives DDT has saved over the past century with little-to-no adverse environmental impact and no harm to human health.

Malaria is far too serious a disease to be left to the unaccountable and ineffectual UN agencies and Roll Back Malaria partners.

Saying that Roll Back Malaria is a failure is an understatement.

If the World Health Organizationfumbled with Roll Back Malaria, why should they be trusted in the pole position of the latest global campaign, to treat three millionAIDS patients by 2005?