A summary of Charles S. Bullock and Ronald Keith Gaddie's study on voting rights progress in Alaska, Michigan, New Hampshire, and South Dakota.

Romney was the big, big winner in delegates, but that doesn't mean that he'll be handed the nomination.

While the mandate question holds great constitutional interest, the outcome won't greatly affect Obamacare's operation one way or the other. The Medicaid question, in contrast, is crucial.

The court's rationale in Midwest Railcar Repair v. South Dakota Department of Revenue and Regulation contradicts basic principles of public finance economics.

And the Democratic contest goes on: to West Virginia! to Kentucky! to Oregon, Puerto Rico, and South Dakota! . . . or does it? AEI’s Election Watch team will reconvene on May 22 to discuss primary positioning, poll patterns, pocketbook issues, the politics of the presidential contest, the congressional and...

Republicans in many states are pursuing two avenues to tilt elections their way—changing the electoral college rules in the middle of the game and using laws and regulations to block likely Democratic voters from exercising their legitimate franchise. Both ploys demand new thinking to enhance our elections, not constrain them in partisan ways.

From the standpoint of civil liberties, the individual right to work—without being forced to join a union or pay dues—has a much better claim than collective bargaining.

An independent or third-party candidate, whether an ideological one such as George Wallace or a non-ideologue such as John Anderson or Ross Perot, would fall short. But consider three ways a third candidate can affect the outcome of a presidential contest.