Search Results
-
FILTER BY DATEAll Time
-
-
FILTER BY RELEVANCEMost Relevant
-
-
FILTER BY CONTENT TYPEAll Content Types
-
Should people lose rights because they are sympathetic to, but do not actually help, terrorist groups?
When it comes to national security, we should give the president the resources he needs.
The costs of having top political posts vacant across the administration are high, and not just for the president.
Democrats may think that people on watch lists should be denied their rights to own a gun, but what is next? Why not just put all people on "watch lists" directly in prison?
If the FBI felt it was spread thin before Sept. 11, imagine what has happened since.
It is shocking that no leader has tried to ensure that Congress can function through a catastrophe, whether caused by terrorism or epidemic.
Introduction
For a bankrupt country in the middle of hyperinflation, the discovery of a major diamond deposit in Zimbabwe in June 2006 should have been good news. Instead it has provided sustenance to a volatile and violent political elite that suppresses the majority. The power sharing/coalition government in Zimbabwe came into...
While disentangling the military from politics in Turkey is a noble goal, encouraging it without creation of alternate checks-and-balances is irresponsible.



