Things that start badly seldom end well, and the Baker-Hamilton findings start badly, with the commission's wholly unproven assertions on Iran and Syria.

The Iraq Study Group failed the big test: finding a way to quell the violence.

Policymakers are abuzz with the explosive recommendations for U.S. policy toward Iraq soon to be released by the Baker-Hamilton Commission.

At long last, the Bush administration appears willing to consider increasing the size of the U.S. force in Iraq.

The Baker/Hamilton Commission has a chance to dramatically reshape our thinking about American foreign policy, if only it will ask the right question.

The moderates think they've found a "responsible" way out of Iraq.

Will the Baker-Hamilton Commission make a real contribution in helping us win the war against the fanatic wing of Islam?

Why would a savvy deal-maker like James Baker propose to sign up the United States for yet another doomed, futile round of Israel-Palestine negotiations?