Review of Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges by Robert H. Bork.

Despite a few narrow victories, the administration is faring poorly in the war of attrition over its judicial nominees.

The war against terror should remind us of the need to focus the national government on its constitutional obligations and to forsake local distractions, trivial pursuits, and interest-group concerns.

Many of those who have been saying they wished they had a chance to vote for Cheney and Lieberman for president may still get it.

Contrary to the left's entitlement mind-set, Americans are happiest when they earn what they receive. What the middle class needs most is more of what it already does so well.

His stances for limited government and individual freedom make him the left's lightning rod and the tea party's intellectual godfather. And he is only halfway through the 40 years he may sit on the high court.

Charlie Sheen succeeded at turning his own debasement into a national pseudo-event by calling the very definition of losing “winning.” And that’s what 2011 was all about: pretending to be winning while really losing.

Rather than await the decision on the Affordable Care Act, President Obama decided to attack preemptively with error-filled claims about the place of judicial review in our constitutional system. Judicial review springs from the duty of a court, when deciding a case before it, to enforce the Constitution over a conflicting act of Congress.