The idea that government can create jobs in the economy is a myth, and painting the myth green makes it no less of a myth. The experience of Europe, which has preceded us in the quest for a new green economy, is both negative, and unsustainable, with subsidies being cut back, and feed-in tariffs reduced.

Advocacy journalists sitr up unwarranted hysteria over a weed-killer made to save farmers over $2 billion.

Both my own research and reading in the literature suggests that EPA has serious problems in the way it employs scientific information when it assesses both the potential benefits, and potential costs of existing and proposed public policies.

If we don't rely on science to guide us, we might make the day for Whole Foods Market devotees, but it would have a devastating effect on the nutritionally poor and the world food supply.

An embryo, animal as well as human, possesses indwelling powers of organic and integrated self-development and ontogensis worthy of respect.

Should student in science classes be taught alternative theories to evolution?

Polar bear populations are not declining, which throws cold water on environmentalists' claims that we need to leave the Arctic untouched.

Does the campaign against plastic bags make environmental sense?