Renewing the threat: those in Congress smart enough to reject cap-and-trade should be smart enough to reject it again, even if it is couched in different language.

Three significant members of the United States Climate Action Partnership are no longer supporting cap-and-trade.

Congress should apply to climate change the market-based solution that it successfully applied to acid rain nearly twenty years ago.

The Boxer-Kerry Cap and Trade Bill is a "tougher" bill than Waxman-Markey, requiring a greater reduction of GHG by 2020 -- meaning requiring the impossible.

A cap-and-trade system with freely allocated permits is equivalent to a carbon tax in which the tax revenue is given to stockholders.

The Waxman-Markey bill now before the US Senate requires the wholesale remaking of the entire energy sector over the next four decades, at huge expense, and with a guarantee, sadly, that it will not fulfil its central goal of significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

We cannot protect our environment with job-killing higher taxes and growth-stifling government regulation.

The proposed cap-and-trade system would be a costly policy that would penalize Americans and have little effect on global warming.