Cap and trade may be superior to command-and-control regulatory approaches, but it is not necessarily superior to other alternatives, such as a carbon tax.

President Obama’s all-of-the-above strategy isn’t a policy change, it’s just a lie.

Unlocking "unconventional" energy requires unconventional politics, and that's one resource that is genuinely scarce among today's backwards-looking bureaucrats and green interest groups.

This panel will explore potential positive and negative economic and environmental impacts from a national carbon tax in the post-cap-and-trade policy environment.

The chances of seeing a properly valued, revenue-neutral carbon tax are about as likely as the chances of seeing a unicorn-powered spaceship. The idea would cause nothing but misery. Here are a few reasons why:

The new stealth approach to energy policy being pushed under the guise of a Clean Energy Standard is frankly dishonest.

When economies are already laboring under too much spending, and are at diminishing-return levels of taxation, implementing a carbon tax would be a mistake.

One critical economic question surrounding cap-and-trade is how to distribute the permits.