Search Results
-
FILTER BY DATEAll Time
-
-
FILTER BY RELEVANCEMost Relevant
-
-
FILTER BY CONTENT TYPEAll Content Types
-
Media, university and corporate elites still profess belief in global warming alarmism, but moves toward policies limiting carbon emissions have fizzled out, here and abroad.
Neo-liberal environmentalists are selling carbon offsets as a pain-free way to save the planet from global warming. But it is not that easy.
Cap-and-trade is an inappropriate policy tool for the control of greenhouse gases that will cause significant economic harm with little or no environmental benefit.
Many analysts have written about the innumerable problems with cap-and-trade, and most of the problems that have been predicted have found their way into the current cap-and-trade law working its way through Congress.
The Boxer-Kerry Cap and Trade Bill is a "tougher" bill than Waxman-Markey, requiring a greater reduction of GHG by 2020 -- meaning requiring the impossible.
Climate science has become one of the most distrusted occupations; it is fast becoming known for reporting exaggerations and bending the truth.
The Waxman-Markey bill now before the US Senate requires the wholesale remaking of the entire energy sector over the next four decades, at huge expense, and with a guarantee, sadly, that it will not fulfil its central goal of significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Alternatives to traditional energy sources are still too expensive.




