Media, university and corporate elites still profess belief in global warming alarmism, but moves toward policies limiting carbon emissions have fizzled out, here and abroad.

The chances of seeing a properly valued, revenue-neutral carbon tax are about as likely as the chances of seeing a unicorn-powered spaceship. The idea would cause nothing but misery. Here are a few reasons why:

A recent article by leading malaria scientists should set the record straight that malaria growth has not been caused by climate change.

When economies are already laboring under too much spending, and are at diminishing-return levels of taxation, implementing a carbon tax would be a mistake.

Five reasons people might not accept the catastrophic modeling exercises and horror stories that have been presented as actual climate change data.

Jeremy Grantham may not be profiting from climate alarmism yet, but he is guilty of talking his own book, as he makes big philanthropic investments in climate science alarmism.

Members of the World Health Organizationare blamingthe spreadof malaria on global warming when the real culprit was modern transportation.

Climate Research Unit e-mails suggest that its scientists have been suppressing and misstating data.