President Obama’s all-of-the-above strategy isn’t a policy change, it’s just a lie.

An assessment of Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty's decision to shut down Ontario's four remaining coal power plants.

One year after the Fukushima disaster, nuclear energy policy is moving in two opposite directions. While much of the world, led by Germany, is embracing caution and winding down nuclear energy ambitions, the US, Britain, France and Russia are poised to boost their nuclear estate.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently rebuffed environmentalists in their bid to get the judiciary to intervene in the global-warming controversy by invoking the old common law of nuisance, as though global warming could be solved through an injunction.

If the EPA proceeds with carbon regulation and power plants are forced to close, energy costs will climb and companies will have less money available for the very research on clean-energy technologies that we need in order to stay competitive with China and other countries.

Will we have the maturity to learn and move forward from nuclear energy's worst moment?

Feed-in tariffs and solar energy make sense in the right situations, but must yield tangible benefits based on carbon reduction and market efficiency.

AB 32 would offer more drawbacks than benefits to California, which produces an insignificant fraction of the world's greenhouse gas emissions. It would offer no climate-protection benefit, and instead cause California to shut down entirely.