Is the dearth of women scientists the result of gender bias? Or is it the result of different interests, life circumstances, and cognitive strengths?

Response to Jeffrey Keefe’s review of “Assessing the Compensation of Public School Teachers.”

I was initially assigned the working title, "Pursuing Equality in Health Care for the Elderly Is Futile." I prefer to think of that particular dead end of health policy as one of listening to the wrong music for too long. Hence, this article revises the title song of the movie, Urban Cowboy, to "Looking for better health [rather than either "love" or "love of equality"] in all the wrong places.

The U.S. Preventive Task Force's recent recommendation that women should not begin routine mammograms until age fifty has sparked controversy.

The authors of the November 2011 Heritage Foundation report “Assessing the Compensation of Public-School Teachers” respond to questions and concerns, in the process showing that certain critical accusations—such as undercounting teachers’ work hours or overestimating retirement benefits—are simply false.

What explains the preponderance of men in math and science-based professions?

A new book rightly points to those attributes which we all must recognize as uniquely male, flying in the face of political correctness and efforts within education to avoid "gender bias."

The time for free, informed inquiry into sex differences is now.