Two years after its enactment, ObamaCare remains unpopular, unaffordable and unworkable. This week, three days of oral argument before the Supreme Court should confirm that it’s also unconstitutional.

For many decades, the United States has randomly assigned three-judge panels on courts of appeals, which produces extensive evidence of the effect of judicial ideology on judges" votes.

Written by a leading advocate of executive power and a fellow Constitutional scholar, "Taming Globalization" promises to spark widespread debate.

Join the Federalist Society and AEI for a panel discussion of John Yoo and Julian Ku's new book, where Martin Flaherty of the Fordham University School of Law and Jeremy Rabkin of the George Mason University School of Law will join the authors in a discussion of their proposals and whether they are faithful to our Constitution, our history and our international law obligations.

At this AEI event, panelists will discuss the practical potential and wisdom of further changes to patent law designed to promote innovation and entrepreneurial vigor in the United States.

Senator and Colonel Lindsey Graham will reflect on the conflict in Afghanistan and discuss new legislation he introduced to govern habeas corpus reviews by the federal courts.

Rather than await the decision on the Affordable Care Act, President Obama decided to attack preemptively with error-filled claims about the place of judicial review in our constitutional system. Judicial review springs from the duty of a court, when deciding a case before it, to enforce the Constitution over a conflicting act of Congress.

Waiting to act until the Supreme Court has made its decision on ObamaCare proves risky for all involved.