Panelists will discuss the potential benefits and liabilities of the Clean Air Act.

Eighty-five percent of everything Americans do with energy might soon be regulated by the EPA.

Was the Environmental Protection Agency’s denial of the petition to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases from motor vehicles reasonable?

Roger Scruton discusses why the environmental movement fits well under the umbrella of conservatism through his new book,  How to Think Seriously About the Planet.

Policies to promote biofuels are extensive. The political rhetoric justifying them typically takes one of three forms. The first is to support farmer wealth.  The second is to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. And the third is to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs).

Based on Energy InformationAdministration estimates, it appears that the main thing Americans will gain from greenhouse gas reductions is higher energy bills.

The controversy over the Clean Air Act is worth understanding because it reveals a pivotal development that EPA and the environmental groups would prefer to conceal: the 40-year-old act is no longer a sensible way to regulate large-volume conventional air pollutants such as ozone and particulate matter.