Not long ago, environmental groups were heralding natural gas as a “bridge fuel to a more climate-friendly energy supply.” Today, New York “progressives” are leading the charge to demonize it as a “bridge to nowhere” — producing “water contamination, air pollution, global warming and fractured communities.” Why the flip-flop?

Just a year after the BP oil spill, America is on the verge of a new golden era of oil exploration and production -- unless President Obama and his environmentalist friends get their way.

Unlocking "unconventional" energy requires unconventional politics, and that's one resource that is genuinely scarce among today's backwards-looking bureaucrats and green interest groups.

The tentative collaboration of evangelicals and environmentalists may provide a path out of the rut of current popular environmental discourse.

As the G-8 negotiations enter their final phase there appears to be no deal on agricultural subsidies or climate change; France's proposalsarepotentially disastrous for global economies.

Greens keep returning to their abuser after another promise to do good, but nothing in President Obama's oil spill speech should offer them any hope that the administration is really going to change.

Sept. 11 depreciated the claim that the ruin of the environment is the single most urgent threat facing civilization, and it deprived them of their favorite whipping boy--the Bush administration.

Fracking technology has the potential to multiply the world's supply of natural gas and emit less in the way of greenhouse gases--unless environmental advocacy groups slow the wheels of change.