Better-designed provider-level measurement can make the cost containment tools of differential reimbursement, high-performance tiered networks, valuebased benefit design, clinical re-engineering, and the responsible choices they offer more visible and effective.

Which politicians do you trust more to micromanage your health care: federal or state? That’s the false choice presented by two versions of “federalism” intended to divide responsibility for health policy between the national government and the states.

Advocates of interstate competition and choice in health insurance contend that state-level mandates for particular benefits, providers, and types of coverage, as well as other regulations, distort prices, increase health care costs, and reduce access to affordable insurance. Several members of Congress and at least one presidential candidate have proposed...

On November 5, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Davis v. Kentucky Department of Revenue—a lawsuit that threatens the continued existence of hundreds of single-state municipal bond funds, each of which holds a particular state’s bonds and caters to that state’s residents. The Supreme Court...

May Texas courts decide antitrust cases over allegedly anticompetitive conduct that, unfortunately, occurred wholly outside of Texas?

If the individual mandate is upheld, Americans will have suffered a loss of liberty from which there will be no turning back.

Tom Miller's speech at the Pioneer Institute's health care policy luncheon and The Great Experiment book launch on March 13, 2012.