Search Results
-
FILTER BY DATEAll Time
-
-
FILTER BY RELEVANCEMost Relevant
-
-
FILTER BY CONTENT TYPEAll Content Types
-
When or if dedicated anti-BPA campaigners yield to the emerging science remains to be seen. Let's hope the OEHHA has the wisdom and courage to base its decision on science rather than on a narrow interpretation of Proposition 65.
The term "political science" used to mean public policy studied not just as opinion but based on empirical, documentable evidence. Today it's come to mean something darker--the subversion of science in the hands of ideologues committed to manipulating public policy to their end. This new, and disheartening use of the...
Advocacy journalists sitr up unwarranted hysteria over a weed-killer made to save farmers over $2 billion.
Air pollution will decline in the future, regardless of whether there is global warming,but the Natural Resources Defense Councilcontinues to exaggeratefuture temperature increases.
The costs to society - economically and socially - from setting policies based on fear rather than science are significant. The fear of synthetic chemicals diverts our focus and drains public funds from addressing documented dangers.
Styrene's recent listing as "reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen" means something very different from how it is being framed by advocacy groups and the media—and this knowledge gap threatens to wreck legislative havoc across the country.
Heat Advisoryargues that global warming will cause increases in future ozone smog levels, because warmer temperatures favor ozone formation, but thissmog claim is bogus.
Three significant members of the United States Climate Action Partnership are no longer supporting cap-and-trade.







