The last, best hope for postal reform

US Postal Service letter carrier Dennis Stecz prepares to deliver mail on Jan.28, 2009 in San Lorenzo, California.

Article Highlights

  • Declines are result of the diversion of communications into cheaper & faster electronic substitutes for #mail

    Tweet This

  • Postal Service reported a $5.1 billion loss for its 2011 fiscal year & expects to lose over $18 billion annually by 2015

    Tweet This

  • Congress considers new bill - The 21st Century Postal Service Act - S. 1789, which is a big step in the right direction

    Tweet This

The Postal Service is now up that well-known creek, and without a paddle. As the nearby chart shows, first-class mail volumes are now down over 25 percent since their highs in 2001. Just as travelers prefer cars to horse-drawn carriages, these declines are the result of the diversion of communications into cheaper and faster electronic substitutes for mail, such as e-mail, texting, and phone calls.

"Just as travelers prefer cars to horse-drawn carriages, these declines are the result of the diversion of communications into cheaper and faster electronic substitutes for mail." -- Richard Geddes

This is hard on the Postal Service since it makes about three times the amount of profits for each piece of first-class mail that it makes on a piece of advertising, or standard mail. With the economic downturn, however, advertising mail has also been falling. The mail decline reflects the falling value mailers get from physical mail delivery, and there is little the Postal Service can do to reverse it.

But the underlying economics are even worse than the horse and carriage. Mail delivery is often thought to benefit from "economies of scale," or falling unit costs as output rises. There are high initial costs associated with creating a nationwide mail delivery network. As the Postal Service gets bigger, it can spread those costs out over more letters, and thus deliver each letter more cheaply. Of course, economies of scale also work in reverse: as mail volumes decline the cost of delivering each letter rises.

The Postal Service is thus being squeezed between falling revenues and rising unit costs, a classic recipe for fiscal disaster. The result appears in the next figure. The Postal Service reported a $5.1 billion loss for its 2011 fiscal year, and expects to lose over $18 billion annually by 2015 unless something changes. Shockingly, Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe announced that the Service will actually run out of cash by October. If gas prices continue to rise, it could be a lot sooner.

None of this was preordained. Governments around the world saw the internet revolution coming years ago. They allowed, and indeed encouraged, their posts to adjust in myriad ways, including by cutting costs, improving service, and through organizational and in some cases ownership changes.

In the United States, Congressional actions allowing the Postal Service to adjust to the new communications marketplace are way past due. Fortunately, Congress is considering a new bill - "The 21st Century Postal Service Act," S. 1789, which is a big step in the right direction.

One key way for the Postal Service to adjust is by cutting costs. Since 80 percent of postal costs are related to labor, serious reform must allow the Service to reduce those costs. S. 1789 does that in a ingenious and compassionate way.

There is wide agreement that the Service has overpayed into the Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS) by about $7 billion over time. Rather than tapping overburdened taxpayers, the bill would use those overpayments to provide incentives to reduce the Service's workforce by an estimated 100,000, or about 20 percent, over the next three years without layoffs, by offering employee buyouts and early-retirement incentives.

Also, for the first time, the bill would require arbitrators to consider the financial condition of the Postal Service when rendering a binding arbitration decision. The only reasonable reaction to such a provision must be, "why was this not done before?"

The bill would also allow the Service to undertake a number of valuable cost-cutting measures that would have only modest effects on service. For example, it would allow some deliveries to be converted from front door to curbside, which the Postal Service has estimated would save up to $4.5 billion per year. It would also allow the Service to optimize its network by converting some retail outlets to window service inside a nearby drug store, for example, which would reduce the costs of providing those services in separate buildings.

There are many other things to like about S. 1789, such as its overhaul of the entire the Federal Worker's compensation program - which is also way overdue and would save the Service billions. Suffice to say that this important bill may be the last, best hope for reforming the Postal Service before taxpayers are handed the bill for its impending fiscal Armageddon.

Rick Geddes is an Associate Professor at Cornell University, and an Adjunct Scholar with AEI.  He is author of Saving the Mail: How to Solve the Problems Of the U.S. Postal Service (AEI Press: 2003).

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author


R. Richard
  • Rick Geddes is associate professor in the Department of Policy Analysis and Management at Cornell University. His research fields include private infrastructure investment through public-private partnerships, postal service policy, corporate governance, women's property rights, and antitrust policy. He is a Research Associate at the Mineta Transportation Institute, and a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. He was a Fulbright Senior Scholar at Australian National University in Canberra in the fall of 2009, and a Visiting Researcher at the Australian Government's Productivity Commission in the spring of 2010. His research focused on Australian public-private partnerships in both positions. Geddes teaches courses at Cornell on corporate governance and the regulation of industry.

    In addition to his teaching and research at Cornell, Geddes served as a commissioner on the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission, which submitted its report to Congress in January 2008. He has held positions as a senior staff economist on the President's Council of Economic Advisers, Visiting Faculty Fellow at Yale Law School, and National Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.

    In 2008, Geddes received the Kappa Omicron Nu/Human Ecology Alumni Association Student Advising Award. His published work has appeared in the American Economic Review, the Journal of Regulatory Economics, the Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, the Journal of Legal Studies, the Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, the Journal of Law and Economics, the Journal of Law, Economics, and Policy, and Managerial and Decision Economics, among others.

  • Email: [email protected]

What's new on AEI

AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters
image A nation divided by marriage
image Teaching reform
image Socialist party pushing $20 minimum wage defends $13-an-hour job listing
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
Monday, October 20, 2014 | 2:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Warfare beneath the waves: The undersea domain in Asia

We welcome you to join us for a panel discussion of the undersea military competition occurring in Asia and what it means for the United States and its allies.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014 | 8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
AEI Election Watch 2014: What will happen and why it matters

AEI’s Election Watch is back! Please join us for two sessions of the longest-running election program in Washington, DC. 

Wednesday, October 22, 2014 | 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
What now for the Common Core?

We welcome you to join us at AEI for a discussion of what’s next for the Common Core.

Thursday, October 23, 2014 | 10:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Brazil’s presidential election: Real challenges, real choices

Please join AEI for a discussion examining each candidate’s platform and prospects for victory and the impact that a possible shift toward free-market policies in Brazil might have on South America as a whole.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.