Sabah Sitrep: Sulu sultanate sustains sanguinary South Seas scuffle

Reuters

Malaysian soldiers move into Kampung Tanduo, where troops stormed the camp of an armed Filipino group, in Lahad Datu, Sabah state, in this handout photo taken March 5, 2013.

Article Highlights

  • The struggle in Sabah is a toxic brew of nationalism, religion, and anti-colonialist memories

    Tweet This

  • The only good news out of the Sabah scuffle is that Manila and Kuala Lumpur seem to be cooperating closely

    Tweet This

  • The sultan’s dreams of tribal expansion threaten to upend the peace pact between Manila and Islamic rebels

    Tweet This

It sounds like something out of the Flashman series: A ragtag army loyal to the 75-year-old Sultan of Sulu invaded the northern part of Borneo in early February. Their goal was to retake the state of Sabah from Malaysia, which in turn received it at independence from Great Britain, which had taken it over from the 19th century British North Borneo Company. But, since Sulu itself became part of the newly independent Philippines in the 1940s, the Sultanate surrendered its claim over Sabah to the Philippines, and Malaysia decided it was cricket to acknowledge the traditional ties by paying the government of the Philippines a token amount each year for the right to control Sabah. Got that?

Well, it’s no longer a laughing matter, as I explained in the Wall Street Journal this week. After a month of negotiating with the 200-odd insurgents who occupied a town in Sabah, Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak last week ordered paramilitary police to clear them out. Since then, fighting has led to 60 deaths, including eight Malaysian policemen and 52 insurgents. Thirty-one insurgents were killed on Thursday alone. The Malaysian army has moved in, and this week, Kuala Lumpur rejected a United Nations cease-fire plea. The sultan agreed to the cease-fire, but has rejected all demands by both Malaysia and the Philippines to renounce his claim and call back his fighters. The struggle is a toxic brew of nationalism, religion, and anti-colonialist memories — all of which go to show how hard it is to create modern nation states in archipelagic regions where dim claims to islands by distant rulers were the norm for centuries.

The only good news out of this South Seas scuffle is that Manila and Kuala Lumpur seem to be cooperating closely, at least so far. Philippines president Benigno Aquino announced criminal charges were being drawn up for the sultan, though he wouldn’t approve an extradition request from Malaysia. Ships from both countries are patrolling the waters between them in order to ward off any other adventurers who may decide to join the cause.

However, the longer this goes on, the more the danger grows that nationalist passions in both countries could shortcircuit the official cooperation. Malaysia may use overwhelming force, resulting in an outcry in the Philippines, or Manila could be seen as not acting strongly enough to stop the sultan. One reason for President Aquino’s measured response is that the sultan’s territory is in the southern state of Mindanao, where the government just concluded a peace treaty with Islamic rebels after a 40-year struggle. The sultan’s dreams of 19th-century tribal expansion threaten to upend this crucial peace pact, if local forces believe Manila is crushing a fellow-Islamic movement.

The news stories may evoke images of Joseph Conrad, or Harry Flashman cavorting among the islanders, but the situation is deadly real, and cuts right to the fragility of today’s Southeast Asian nations. So far, it’s been handled well, but with the U.N. now stirring the pot and riling up Malaysia, things may get worse before the inevitable end of the Royal Sulu Army is written.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Michael
Auslin

What's new on AEI

Four years of Dodd-Frank damage
image Dodd-Frank, financial institutions, and public opinion
image Time for an Anwar Sadat moment in the Middle East
image Freedom of the skies at risk
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Closing the gaps in health outcomes: Alternative paths forward

Please join us for a broader exploration of targeted interventions that provide real promise for reducing health disparities, limiting or delaying the onset of chronic health conditions, and improving the performance of the US health care system.

Event Registration is Closed
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Comprehending comprehensive universities

Join us for a panel discussion that seeks to comprehend the comprehensives and to determine the role these schools play in the nation’s college completion agenda.

Event Registration is Closed
Tuesday, July 22, 2014 | 8:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Who governs the Internet? A conversation on securing the multistakeholder process

Please join AEI’s Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy for a conference to address key steps we can take, as members of the global community, to maintain a free Internet.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Expanding opportunity in America: A conversation with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan

Please join us as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveils a new set of policy reforms aimed at reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility throughout America.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 6:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m.
Is it time to end the Export-Import Bank?

We welcome you to join us at AEI as POLITICO’s Ben White moderates a lively debate between Tim Carney, one of the bank’s fiercest critics, and Tony Fratto, one of the agency’s staunchest defenders.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.