Did the Obama admininstration conceal USAID’s expulsion from Russia for over two months?

US AID/Dmitry Feklisov

A USAID-funded project in St. Petersburg, Russia, demonstrated practical ways people could conserve resources and save energy, September 26, 2003.

The State Department last week announced that Moscow has moved to evict USAID from Russia after two decades of work inside the country and nearly $3 billion spent in total aid. A State Department spokeswoman almost justified the closure of USAID’s mission in Russia, which she described as “a sovereign nation’s decision.” When the Obama administration asked Moscow to extend the deadline for USAID’s exit from October 1 until May 2013, the Kremlin quickly rebuffed its request. Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich added that, “We proceed from the assumption that this decision by a sovereign state should be implemented in full measure.”

Let’s ignore the fact that the State Department and Russian Foreign Ministry seem to share talking points. The real issue here concerns dates — and not just the October 1 deadline. The White House claims that it first learned about Moscow’s decision when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton attended the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Vladivostok earlier this month. Not so says the Russian Foreign Ministry. Mr. Lukashevich is baffled by the administration’s supposed surprise. He insists that Secretary Clinton was informed of the Kremlin’s verdict by her Russian counterpart in late June.

If true, this raises further — and much more serious — questions about how the administration has handled USAID’s eviction. Why wasn’t Russia’s decision publicized last June? In an attempt to ease the pain of the election monitors, AIDS clinics, child-welfare organizations and other groups that USAID supports, why wasn’t an orderly transition plan conceived and put in place? Instead, as a result of the administration’s hushed private capitulation since June, we now find ourselves having to plead with an increasingly authoritarian Vladimir Putin for a six to seven month extension. But why, more broadly, has it come to this?

It’s pretty simple — because the expulsion of USAID runs counter to President Obama’s narrative of a successful “reset” policy. At this point, his Russia policy amounts to reset at any cost. Never mind the facts. Never mind the reality of Russia’s behavior both internally and externally. When that reality contradicts its reset narrative the administration will shamelessly sweep it under the carpet.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

We still don't know how many people Obamacare enrolled
image The war on invisible poverty
image Cutting fat from the budget
image Speaker of the House John Boehner on resetting America’s economic foundation
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 22
    MON
  • 23
    TUE
  • 24
    WED
  • 25
    THU
  • 26
    FRI
Monday, September 22, 2014 | 2:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Policy implications of the new US labor market normal

We welcome you to join us as a panel of economists discuss US wage and price prospects in the coming months and the implications for the Federal Reserve’s current unorthodox monetary policy.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.