Forces required for one US base in Afghanistan after 2014

U.S. Air Force photo/Tech. Sgt. Matt Hecht

Two U.S. Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters prepares for takeoff at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, on Dec 4, 2011.

Article Highlights

  • The notion of keeping only 3,000 troops in Afghanistan is militarily infeasible.

    Tweet This

  • 3k troops are not sufficient to keep even a single US military base in Afghanistan after 2014.

    Tweet This

Three thousand troops are not sufficient to keep even a single U.S. military base in Afghanistan after 2014. This report, released jointly with the Institute for the Study of War, describes how to calculate the force requirements for keeping one single base in Afghanistan after 2014, concluding that it is not possible to do so with fewer than about 6,000 troops. The report identifies many (but not all) of the specific tasks and specialties required to keep an airbase capable of handling large cargo aircraft running and to protect it against known, current enemy capabilities. It also finds that a base manned at such a level would have virtually no ability to advise and assist the Afghan National Security Forces or even to conduct meaningful counter-terrorism operations. The notion of keeping only 3,000 troops in Afghanistan is militarily infeasible.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine

What's new on AEI

'Just win, baby': The politics of Obamacare
image Ring the alarm bells over Puerto Rico
image US oil production keeps surging, so why haven’t oil and gasoline prices fallen?
image How 'Captain America' conquered China — and why it matters
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 18
    MON
  • 19
    TUE
  • 20
    WED
  • 21
    THU
  • 22
    FRI
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.