Medicare 2035: Older, sicker, poorer

Reuters

A pair of elderly couples view the ocean and waves along the beach in La Jolla, California March 8, 2012.

Article Highlights

  • Baby boomers are beginning to realize that Medicare’s future matters – it will still be there, but they may not like it.

    Tweet This

  • Medicare spending will soar from $575 bil. in 2012 to $1.1 tril. in 2022, assuming Congress stands firm on budget cuts.

    Tweet This

  • Our best hope for making Medicare successful today and in 2035 is to improve the way health care is delivered.

    Tweet This

We baby boomers are beginning to realize that the future of Medicare matters — to us, not just to our grandchildren. Most of us will still be around in 25 years, and we’re beginning to wonder whether Medicare will be there for us. It will be, but we will not like what we get unless Washington gets serious about overhauling the program.

Some may think that the president’s Affordable Care Act (ACA) already reformed Medicare. Congress reduced Medicare spending by $700 billion over the next decade by cutting provider payments rather than reducing benefits, or so the politicians claim. That money was not used to shore up Medicare for the future. It was used to fund new federal health programs, leaving Medicare in no better financial shape than before. Worse yet, those savings did not come from any significant change in the way Medicare operates. It is business as usual, and that business is obviously failing.

"Most of us will still be around in 25 years, and we’re beginning to wonder whether Medicare will be there for us. It will be, but we will not like what we get unless Washington gets serious about overhauling the program." -Joseph AntosIf those cuts actually were implemented, Medicare beneficiaries would face increasing difficulty getting care. Medicare would pay Medicaid rates — and Medicaid is notorious for providing very limited access to health care. So we would have coverage, but we would join the back of the line waiting for an appointment with the doctor.

That seems unlikely. Congress is not known for sticking to its guns when constituents are not happy, and making seniors wait for their health care is not something a politician wants to do. As we have seen played out many times in recent years, Congress will replace the big reductions in prices with small increases, hoping to put off any hard decision about how we will cope with Medicare’s rising cost until after the next election, or the one after that.

But the hard decision cannot be put off indefinitely. Medicare spending will soar from $575 billion this year to $1.1 trillion in 2022, and that assumes Congress will stand firm on the health care legislation’s budget cuts. The program’s cost is already growing faster than other major parts of the federal budget and the pace will pick up as the baby boomers age and need more health care. Without real Medicare reform, the rising cost would mean either large, ongoing tax increases or large, ongoing cuts in other federal programs. Taxing the rich will not cover the cost, and soon taxing the middle class will not be enough. Next up: choosing between paying more for inefficient health care and paying to educate our children, help the poor, and protect the country.

There is a better way, and it will pay dividends beyond the Medicare program. We can change the incentives in Medicare that drive up unnecessary program spending and that impose inefficiencies on the broader health care system. Reforming Medicare can transform health care delivery and lead to better value for everyone’s health care dollar.

Paul Ryan’s premium support proposal changes the terms on which Medicare operates. The unlimited subsidy of traditional fee-for-service Medicare rewards health care providers for delivering more services, even when they are of little value for improving the patient’s welfare. By giving seniors a fixed subsidy and a wide choice of competing health plans, including traditional Medicare, the incentive shifts from doing more to doing better. Health plans and providers will seek more efficient ways of delivering the right care at the right time, which could lower the cost curve and improve patient outcomes.

We can continue on the current path, attempting to control Medicare spending by ratcheting down on prices, regulating the activities of providers and health plans, and limiting the options for seniors. Or we can make use of the energy and innovation possible in the health sector by providing positive incentives to improve the way health care is delivered. The second path is not an easy one, but it is our best hope for making Medicare successful today and in 2035.

Joseph Antos is the Wilson H. Taylor Scholar in Health Care and Retirement Policy at the American Enterprise Institute.

 

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Joseph
Antos

  •  


    Mr. Antos's research focuses on the economics of health policy—including Medicare and broader health system reform, health care financing, health insurance regulation, and the uninsured—and federal budget policy. He has written and spoken extensively on the Medicare drug benefit and has led a team of experienced independent actuaries and cost estimators in a study to evaluate various proposals to extend health coverage to the uninsured. His work on the country’s budget crisis includes a detailed plan to achieve fiscal stability and economic growth developed in conjunction with AEI colleagues.  


    Joseph Antos is also a health adviser to the Congressional Budget Office and recently completed two terms as a commissioner of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission.  Before joining AEI, Mr. Antos was Assistant Director for Health and Human Resources at the Congressional Budget Office and held senior positions in the U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, the Office of Management and Budget, and the President’s Council of economic Advisers.


     



    Watch Mr. Antos in an interview with Bill Erwin of the Alliance for Health Reform on "Will Health Reform Reduce the Federal Deficit?"


    nullFollow Joseph Antos on Twitter

  • Phone: 202-862-5938
    Email: jantos@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Catherine Griffin
    Phone: 2028625920
    Email: catherine.griffin@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image Swearing in the enemy
image Syria and American strategy
image Commencement speakers: Conservatives need not apply
image The literary profession and civic culture
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 20
    MON
  • 21
    TUE
  • 22
    WED
  • 23
    THU
  • 24
    FRI
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
Free beer: Liberating libations from ‘Bootleggers and Baptists’

Join us for a discussion of the history and future of federal and state alcohol regulation and competition, followed by a reception with beer, wine, and spirits.

Event Registration is Closed
Wednesday, May 22, 2013 | 5:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.
NCLB sanctions: Tests taken, lessons learned

Join education scholars and practitioners for a discussion about the latest NCLB research and its implications for future education policy.

Thursday, May 23, 2013 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Competing visions of the common good: Rethinking help for the poor

What shared commitments do we have as citizens and neighbors to care for one another? How can a proper ordering of America’s political economy enable the most people to have the best life? At this event, Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA), a longtime champion of human rights causes, and AEI President Arthur Brooks will join Wallis in addressing these and other questions.

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.