Again, the US for the world

Reuters

Voters line up to cast their ballots for the U.S. presidential election at the Penrose recreation center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, November 6, 2012.

Article Highlights

  • Election 2012 is a decision both about the role of government in society & about the role of the US in the world

    Tweet This

  • Obamacare represents the largest government social service program since FDR signed the 1935 Social Security Act into law

    Tweet This

  • Sequestration would fundamentally alter the American ability to project power @MRubin1971

    Tweet This

  • The recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize should have been the United States #military

    Tweet This

Millions of Americans will go to the polls in what may be among the closest elections in U.S. history. The stakes are the highest since World War II: Inherent in the decision is not simply a choice between the between incumbent Barack Obama and challenger Mitt Romney, but also decisions both about the role of government in society and about the role of the United States in the world.

“The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” commonly called Obamacare, represents the largest government social service program since Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law in 1935. While many Europeans see national healthcare as either a right or the function of good government, the intrusion of government into both individual choice and the private sector offends many Americans’ notions of individual liberty and responsibility.

At stake also is the future of the American military. The Budget Control Act of 2011 called for lowering federal spending by $1.2 trillion. Should a “Super Committee” fail to agree on such cuts, the law would trigger automatic cuts of more than $500 billion from the Pentagon budget.  This “sequestration” would fundamentally alter the American ability to project power.

This year, the European Union won the Nobel Peace Prize but if the judges took their logic to the natural conclusion, the true recipient should have been the United States military. Europeans may look at the United Nations and other international organizations as the basis for international law, but since World War II, it has been the American ability to project power—and the American taxpayers’ willingness to fund a robust military—which has enabled institutions such as the United Nations and the European Union to construct elaborate diplomatic and political structures under the guise of maintaining peace. Should the United States end its ability to conduct two military operations simultaneously for the first time since World War II, the assumptions upon which diplomats and statesmen operate will change drastically.

Presidents of both major U.S. parties have embraced notions of American exceptionalism and encouraged the export of democracy. No political program can demonstrate the importance of democracy more than the fact that tens of millions of Americans will go to the polls to hold their government accountable and peacefully resolve issues that could impact both life and death.

 Michael Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute              

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Michael
Rubin

What's new on AEI

Expanding opportunity in America
image Moving beyond fear: Addressing the threat of the Islamic state in Iraq and Syria
image Foreign policy is not a 'CSI' episode
image The Air Force’s vital role
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Monday, July 21, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Closing the gaps in health outcomes: Alternative paths forward

Please join us for a broader exploration of targeted interventions that provide real promise for reducing health disparities, limiting or delaying the onset of chronic health conditions, and improving the performance of the US health care system.

Monday, July 21, 2014 | 4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Comprehending comprehensive universities

Join us for a panel discussion that seeks to comprehend the comprehensives and to determine the role these schools play in the nation’s college completion agenda.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014 | 8:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.
Who governs the Internet? A conversation on securing the multistakeholder process

Please join AEI’s Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy for a conference to address key steps we can take, as members of the global community, to maintain a free Internet.

Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m.
Expanding opportunity in America: A conversation with House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan

Please join us as House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveils a new set of policy reforms aimed at reducing poverty and increasing upward mobility throughout America.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, July 24, 2014 | 6:00 p.m. – 7:15 p.m.
Is it time to end the Export-Import Bank?

We welcome you to join us at AEI as POLITICO’s Ben White moderates a lively debate between Tim Carney, one of the bank’s fiercest critics, and Tony Fratto, one of the agency’s staunchest defenders.

Event Registration is Closed
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.