Again, the US for the world

Reuters

Voters line up to cast their ballots for the U.S. presidential election at the Penrose recreation center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, November 6, 2012.

Article Highlights

  • Election 2012 is a decision both about the role of government in society & about the role of the US in the world

    Tweet This

  • Obamacare represents the largest government social service program since FDR signed the 1935 Social Security Act into law

    Tweet This

  • Sequestration would fundamentally alter the American ability to project power @MRubin1971

    Tweet This

  • The recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize should have been the United States #military

    Tweet This

Millions of Americans will go to the polls in what may be among the closest elections in U.S. history. The stakes are the highest since World War II: Inherent in the decision is not simply a choice between the between incumbent Barack Obama and challenger Mitt Romney, but also decisions both about the role of government in society and about the role of the United States in the world.

“The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” commonly called Obamacare, represents the largest government social service program since Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law in 1935. While many Europeans see national healthcare as either a right or the function of good government, the intrusion of government into both individual choice and the private sector offends many Americans’ notions of individual liberty and responsibility.

At stake also is the future of the American military. The Budget Control Act of 2011 called for lowering federal spending by $1.2 trillion. Should a “Super Committee” fail to agree on such cuts, the law would trigger automatic cuts of more than $500 billion from the Pentagon budget.  This “sequestration” would fundamentally alter the American ability to project power.

This year, the European Union won the Nobel Peace Prize but if the judges took their logic to the natural conclusion, the true recipient should have been the United States military. Europeans may look at the United Nations and other international organizations as the basis for international law, but since World War II, it has been the American ability to project power—and the American taxpayers’ willingness to fund a robust military—which has enabled institutions such as the United Nations and the European Union to construct elaborate diplomatic and political structures under the guise of maintaining peace. Should the United States end its ability to conduct two military operations simultaneously for the first time since World War II, the assumptions upon which diplomats and statesmen operate will change drastically.

Presidents of both major U.S. parties have embraced notions of American exceptionalism and encouraged the export of democracy. No political program can demonstrate the importance of democracy more than the fact that tens of millions of Americans will go to the polls to hold their government accountable and peacefully resolve issues that could impact both life and death.

 Michael Rubin is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute              

 

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Michael
Rubin


  • Michael Rubin is a former Pentagon official whose major research areas are the Middle East, Turkey, Iran and diplomacy. Rubin instructs senior military officers deploying to the Middle East and Afghanistan on regional politics, and teaches classes regarding Iran, terrorism, and Arab politics on board deploying U.S. aircraft carriers. Rubin has lived in post-revolution Iran, Yemen, both pre- and post-war Iraq, and spent time with the Taliban before 9/11. His newest book, Dancing with the Devil: The Perils of Engagement examines a half century of U.S. diplomacy with rogue regimes and terrorist groups.


    Follow Michael Rubin on Twitter.


  • Phone: 202-862-5851
    Email: mrubin@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Ahmad Majidyar
    Phone: 202-862-5845
    Email: ahmad.majidyar@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The money in banking: Comparing salaries of bank and bank regulatory employees
image What Obama should say about China in Japan
image A key to college success: Involved dads
image China takes the fight to space
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Event Registration is Closed
Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.