Iran: Leaks, Facts, and Politics

In a just-published post, American Enterprise Institute (AEI) vice president for foreign and defense policy studies Danielle Pletka dissects the recent developments with Iran to determine (1) what we know, (2) what is being said, and (3) how politics is driving policy (full text copied below)

"There are arguments to be made as to why an Israeli strike now on Iran's nuclear program would be ill conceived. There are even arguments to be made for a containment regime. I may not agree with those arguments, but they represent a point of view grounded in an honest assessment of reality. The Post piece, and the administration that leaked it with dishonesty aforethought, purvey an argument based on falsehoods, with motives grounded purely in politics. Again."

Danielle Pletka is the vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at AEI and served for a decade as a senior staffer on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. She is available for interviews and can be reached through Alex Della Rocchetta adr@aei.org or 202.862.7152.

For help reaching any AEI scholars and for all other media requests, please contact Jesse Blumenthal at jesse.blumenthal@aei.org 202.862.4870.

Obama will totally know when Iran is going to build a bomb

Saturday's Washington Post brought us another salvo in the Obama administration information wars against… Israel. Yes, the article was entitled "U.S. intelligence gains in Iran seen as boost to confidence," but the article is intended to convey Obama's certainty that he will know -- let's underscore that: know – with ample warning once Iranian leaders make the decision to go for the bomb. "There is confidence that we would see activity indicating that a decision had been made," a "senior U.S. official involved in high-level discussions about Iran policy" tells the Post. "Across the board, our access has been significantly improved." And so Obama will have lots of time to think about what to do once he knows Iran is determined to build itself a nuclear weapon aaaaaaaaaaaand as a result, Israel should not strike Iran until, you know, after the U.S. election.

Let's disassemble the main points of the piece:
1.    We're using a lot of drones. Drones, in case anyone has been living under a big rock, fly high in the sky and take pictures. So we've got the view from 50,000 feet.
2.    We're listening to a lot of calls and reading a lot of faxes. So if any decisions are being made in writing, we've got some of that covered.
3.    We're running covert ops and human intelligence and investing a lot of money in them both.
4.    "Even in the absolute worst case -- six months -- there is time for the president to have options," the same "senior U.S. official" tells the Post.

Now let's review the facts:

1.    Iran's most important nuclear facilities -- or at least the ones we are aware of -- are hardened under about meters and meters of concrete. Drones cannot see through concrete, and even infrared sensors that can detect the heat signature of a cascade (used to create highly enriched uranium) -- can't see through that much.
2.    Calls and faxes don't tell us with certainty what decisions are being made in the highest offices in Iran. At best, they give us an inkling of what may be going on, if we're lucky.
3.    Our covert ops have been going on for years, and while I have enormous admiration for some with the CIA's Directorate of Operations, I'm also aware of their many screw-ups, failures, lost networks, work with double agents etc. And the Iranians are no slouches at running their own agents and giving us false information.
4.    Six months? For real? First, the Iranians won't need six months to go for a weapon: Read up here to understand why. Second, what kind of intelligence does Obama think he's gonna get? A timeline? This is almost comical.
5.    Then there's the question of Iranian facilities outed by others, including Natanz and the heavy water reactor at Arak. The CIA insists they were aware of those programs all along. I'll try to be diplomatic here: Let's just say that the CIA sees a lot more in hindsight than it does in real time.

6.    Finally, let's review things that were missed by Washington's vaunted intelligence community:

  • India's 1998 nuclear tests.
  • AQ Khan's international nuclear sales.
  • Syria's nuclear program
  • Iraq's 1980s nuclear program (the program was a known issue, but its advance was a total mystery to the IC).
  • North Korea's uranium enrichment program.
  • 9/11
  • The Iranian Islamic Revolution
  • The Arab Spring


Suffice it to say, I could go on.


There are arguments to be made as to why an Israeli strike now on Iran's nuclear program would be ill conceived. There are even arguments to be made for a containment regime. I may not agree with those arguments, but they represent a point of view grounded in an honest assessment of reality. The Post piece, and the administration that leaked it with dishonesty aforethought, purvey an argument based on falsehoods, with motives grounded purely in politics. Again.

Also Visit
AEIdeas Blog The American Magazine
About the Author

 

Danielle
Pletka

  • As a long-time Senate Committee on Foreign Relation senior professional staff member for the Near East and South Asia, Danielle Pletka was the point person on Middle East, Pakistan, India and Afghanistan issues. As the vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at AEI, Pletka writes on national security matters with a focus on Iran and weapons proliferation, the Middle East, Syria, Israel and the Arab Spring. She also studies and writes about South Asia: Pakistan, India and Afghanistan.


    Pletka is the co-editor of “Dissent and Reform in the Arab World: Empowering Democrats” (AEI Press, 2008) and the co-author of “Containing and Deterring a Nuclear Iran” (AEI Press, 2011) and “Iranian influence in the Levant, Egypt, Iraq, and Afghanistan” (AEI Press, 2012). Her most recent study, “America vs. Iran: The competition for the future of the Middle East,” was published in January 2014.


     


    Follow Danielle Pletka on Twitter.


  • Phone: 202-862-5943
    Email: dpletka@aei.org
  • Assistant Info

    Name: Alexandra Della Rocchetta
    Phone: 202-862-7152
    Email: alex.dellarocchetta@aei.org

What's new on AEI

image The Census Bureau and Obamacare: Dumb decision? Yes. Conspiracy? No.
image A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
image Give the CBO long-range tools
image The coming collapse of India's communists
AEI on Facebook
Events Calendar
  • 21
    MON
  • 22
    TUE
  • 23
    WED
  • 24
    THU
  • 25
    FRI
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Graduation day: How dads’ involvement impacts higher education success

Join a diverse group of panelists — including sociologists, education experts, and students — for a discussion of how public policy and culture can help families lay a firmer foundation for their children’s educational success, and of how the effects of paternal involvement vary by socioeconomic background.

Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.
Getting it right: A better strategy to defeat al Qaeda

This event will coincide with the release of a new report by AEI’s Mary Habeck, which analyzes why current national security policy is failing to stop the advancement of al Qaeda and its affiliates and what the US can do to develop a successful strategy to defeat this enemy.

Friday, April 25, 2014 | 9:15 a.m. – 1:15 p.m.
Obamacare’s rocky start and uncertain future

During this event, experts with many different views on the ACA will offer their predictions for the future.   

No events scheduled today.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.
No events scheduled this day.